What does Invasion of privacy means? Is “Privacy” enforced depending on whom or which are the plaintiff and/or the defendant? Is privacy linked exclusively to the instrument used to violate it?
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission proposed a framework for policymakers and businesses to create a more realistic and flexible legal instrument to protect internet users and ensure their privacy. I said realistic and flexible because looking back to the last decade, many policies have been launched in regards online customer protection but the rapid and changing performance of the technology has left them behind.
Internationally talking, many others countries have set efforts to solve this problem as well. But what is the problem? And what are the consequences involved? It is just the veil of the capitalism which one more time wants to control markets thru colleting and sharing customer’s information? Or it is that governments do not want to lose their unique power to control the information flowing thru the citizen’s minds? As we know companies are more knowledgeable than government in technology and innovation matter.

In 2008, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, proposed a Telecommunication Law through which the government would have access to all the information displayed at internet social media websites such as Facebook, Blogger, MSN, IM among others. More recently, a Venezuela’s state electric utility employee was arrested because he posted a message on Twitter that apparently was hurting the credibility of Venezuela’s president. (I would mention that the Venezuelan constitution covers the freedom of speech as well many democratic countries)
So, two main conclusions come to my mind. First, privacy customer’s protection is a fair practice that has to be enforced by businesses and companies worldwide to ensure the well being of buyers, but a more crucial need with a higher priority has to be cover and this is the privacy protection against unscrupulous political systems that attempt to control citizen’s intellect and silence their voices. Second, shouldn’t governments be role models for companies and public in general in regards invasion of privacy? Are antiterrorism policies control the excuse for many countries to sniff people’s computers?
Peace for all countries...